Emil Guillermo: Racism, Eric Garner, and that videotape
December 4, 2014 7:59 PM
Turns out I have more in common with Eric Garner than just the initials E.G.
Earlier this year, I wrote about how I was confronted at a car rental facility near a major airport in Kentucky.
I simply wanted an upgrade on my car. And while I admit to being slightly aggressive with the manager, I didn't expect him to call for police backup.
BART cops in Oakland shot Oscar Grant. So I knew airport cops were a lot more than glorified security guards. When they came for me, they were for real, twice my size, and armed. And it wasn't just one cop.
There were at least three of them in two different vehicles.
Already you can sense a slight overreaction.
But I'm not a 350-pound African American like Eric Garner.
If I were, maybe I'd be dead now.
Perhaps the cops were slightly more restrained toward me because while I am a Filipino American, a tad taller than Manny Pacquiao, the police weren't exactly quaking with fear of my left hook.
I was lucky. My image clearly didn't trigger a negative stereotype that could have brought on a much more aggressive police response.
I kept thinking that as I watched this video again and again. It was uploaded by the bystander who captured Garner's exchange with the NYPD officers last July. The first 7:35 or so is new video of the aftermath once Garner has died. The final section of the tape with 7:35 elapsed is where you'll want to dwell. It's the prelude to the tragic chokehold takedown that's at the heart of this haunting race tragedy.
By now, you know the grand jury in New York City, nearly five months after the death of Garner, has declined to indict the police officers involved in the case.
One might conclude that Lady Justice isn't just blind; she also doesn't mind holding her breath until she turns NYPD Blue.
One also might conclude that giving the police body cams isn't going to be an answer to anything.
No, the core question should really be what a white police officer, or anyone for that matter, sees automatically when approaching a black man who may or may not be a suspect.
In this case, Garner was suspected of selling loose cigarettes, a minor violation of tax law.
But if you're a white cop and the image of a black man communicates negative feelings, then the strength of the automatic bias in the cop could determine what happens.
In truth, automatic bias is present in all of us.
To what degree? You may be able to tell by taking an online test
from Harvard's Project Implicit.
The Implicit Association Test (IAT) on race will reveal to what degree you have an automatic preference between blacks or whites.
You'll be asked to sort pictures of whites and blacks, and based on the speed by which you sort them, the test determines your race preference.
No preference and you're a saint. Maybe not even human.
Any preference, and you've uncovered your bias.
Doesn't make you Adolf Hitler, but the range runs from "little or no preference," to slight, then moderate, followed by "strong," for the real racists among us.
"How implicit associations affect our judgments and behaviors is not well understood and may be influenced by a number of variables," the test results page says. "As such, the score should serve as an opportunity for self-reflection, not as a definitive assessment of your implicit thoughts and feelings. This and future research will clarify the way in which implicit thinking and feelings affects our perception, judgment and action."
So let's not judge. Let's do what the deaths of New York's Garner and Ferguson's Michael Brown are compelling the whole the nation to do---reflect on our biases.
The test showed I had some.
I took the test Monday and had a slight preference for European Americans compared to African Americans. But then I took it again on Thursday after the grand jury announcement on Garner, and guess what? My preference had risen to "moderate."
Maybe it would have been different had I just seen more positive images in the news and the movies, or lived in a less segregated community that is more than 70 percent white.
Is it possible that simply being exposed to positive images of minorities would change a negative stereotypical attitude? The studies suggest that it could. They show that being allied with or seeing a person of color do something simple, like helping you, or something extraordinary, like saving your life, has an automatic impact.
Makes every black man Morgan Freeman or Denzel Washington.
Certainly, it makes the case for making diversity a priority or promoting more programs of inclusion.
Which brings me back to my airport encounter with the police.
Clearly, the white cops weren't fearful of an Asian American of Filipino descent. I didn't even rate any "martial arts" respect.
But something else could have been at play.
Project Implicit has a short test comparing the public's preference for seeing Asians as Americans or Asians as foreigners.
I joked earlier about how not being an African American may have saved me in Kentucky. But what if the cops thought they were called to rein in an unruly and potentially dangerous Asian foreigner cum martial arts expert? It might have been a different situation altogether.
I took the Asian test myself on the IAT site, and it revealed I had just a moderate automatic association of Asian Americans with Americans, and European Americans as foreign. I was among only 6 percent of all test takers.
Slight, moderate to strong automatic associations of Asian Americans as Americans were a minority totaling 17 percent.
But the vast majority who have taken the Asian IAT showed that 60 percent were on the "strong, moderate to slight" side seeing Asian Americans as foreigners.
That's some strong automatic bias we've got to fight.
In retrospect, I'm probably lucky to have gotten out of that rental car place unscathed.
If we want an honest discussion of race in America, we'd better own up to our own automatic biases and realize how these feelings are more fluid than we think. Sure, they all can be manipulated by the images and stereotypes we see in society and the media. But they all can be undone by working hard to be inclusive and respectful of our common humanity.
[For more on the IAT and how police are using the research techniques to foster unbiased police work, see this Mother Jones article
* * *
Posted by:Emil Guillermo
| 0 comments
Emil Guillermo: Officer Darren Wilson's words, and thoughts on Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, and my cousin Stephen
November 25, 2014 11:31 AM
Asian Americans aren't immune to this feeling.
If you are person of color in our society and have experienced the loss of a family member or loved one to a gun death, as I have, then you know the feeling well.
It's one of complete helplessness, like you and your family don't matter. Justice just doesn't seem within reach if you are forced to rely on a district attorney or the police to be your principal attorneys and investigators.
You want to trust they'll work hard on your behalf. That they are good unbiased public servants and that when you go to the store for justice, just as you go to any other store for the product it delivers, you hope the good people will do their jobs and take care of your order. Justice? You would think you'd be able to get that in America.
Are you rich, white, or famous? Nope?
OK, you wait. Take a number. Then the case goes cold.
New murders occur. The easy ones are dealt with. The tough ones die. And then you are the victim again. Of the process.
You're left with a public official's platitudes. Something like, "I wish it weren't this way," often accompanied by a phrase of resignation, such as "Nothing will bring back your loved one..."
It's the hollow words the DA and police pass out in lieu of justice when there just aren't enough "facts" to go forward, to prosecute the known killer of your loved one.
As I watched Ferguson prosecutor Robert McCulloch go through his long wind up about the police shooting of Michael Brown, first I wondered why they waited until night? To insure rioting and looting?
I also thought of the case of my cousin, Stephen Guillermo
, an immigrant from the Philippines struggling to make his way in America with a smile.
He was unarmed when a retired security guard shot him dead on May 3 in his South of Market apartment building in San Francisco.
The circumstances were far different from Michael Brown. More like a Trayvon Martin "stand your ground" case.
But surely, the process and the end message were the same. A senseless death goes unprosecuted. Black youth don't count? Make that all people of color, Asian Americans included.
You want justice?
Sorry, justice is somehow harder for us.
We do get pain and are forced to live with that, until somehow the nothing that we get from the system sinks in and is forced to make sense.
And then we must live with the hollow words, "Nothing can bring him back..."
I feel for Michael Brown and his family. I wish the process worked for people like us in this country. The disenfranchised by skin color, by language or accent, by pocketbook, by neighborhood. Maybe it will be different some day.
As we approach Thanksgiving, let's give thanks for what we've got.
At my table, I'll save a spot for Michael. For Trayvon. For Stephen.
Stephen would have been 27 on Thanksgiving Day, November 27.
His case remains open. We are still waiting to see the official medical examiner's report. The family always has hope and a prayer.
But the signs in society are not so hopeful.
Officer Wilson's Grand Jury Testimony
For Thanksgiving, after the Tofurky and the vegan pumpkin pie, we should all take a look at the Ferguson grand jury testimony
that prosecutor Robert McCulloch released on Monday night.
Instead of whatever we do for post-meal entertainment, maybe we should hold our families close and read Officer Darren Wilson's words aloud to get a sense of how justice works in America.
You can start anywhere. But I was taken by Wilson's "confession" to his police sergeant as he gets back to his squad car.
"I had to kill him," Wilson said. "He grabbed my gun. I shot him. I killed him."
Had to kill Michael Brown? After Brown ran away?
I wish the news hounds on Monday night--instead of flashing their lights on the crowd inducing the "knuckleheads" to do their thing--had simply read from the released grand jury transcripts.
You'd know all about Officer Darren Wilson, 28, in his own words.
That he was a cop for five years and had worked only in black neighborhoods.
How he was no small guy. Six-foot-three, 210 pounds. (Compare that to Michael Brown, 18, six-foot-four, almost 300 pounds.)
The transcript says Wilson didn't care for tasers. Didn't carry one. But he had mace. He didn't like that much either. He wore contacts, and if mace ever got in his face, he was done, he said.
He did have a trusty Sig Sauer P229, .40 caliber, fully loaded.
But he had never used his weapon before. Ever. Until that day.
The transcript makes Wilson sound like an inexperienced greenhorn, not ready for prime time. At best, he was just a white man with a badge, who felt disrespected by two black men he saw walking down the middle of the street.
Wilson seemed to have a special fancy for Brown, who responded to him with an obscenity.
It all went downhill from there.
When the protectors of the community are seen as the enemy, and the people of the community are seen by the protectors as the enemy, we've lost all chance for justice.
In fact, from the time Wilson said he saw Brown to the time he was dead, Wilson says it was maybe a minute or less.
That tells you how quickly justice is lost in America.
The transcript is like a modern urban tragedy. Wilson was in his squad car. He called Brown over. Wilson says he didn't see any weapons, but that Brown hit him on the head. And that's when the struggle started for Wilson's gun.
There were two clicks of the trigger. Nothing. Then the trigger was pulled and the gun went off.
"I think it startled him and me at the same time," said Wilson.
Wilson said Brown stepped back, and described him as looking "like a demon, that's how angry he looked. He comes back towards me again with his hands up. At that point I just went like this, I tried to pull the trigger again; click; nothing happened."
Wilson said he saw Brown's hands up which made him shield his face.
Wilson said at that point Brown hit him. But Wilson also pulled his gun trigger. Nothing. Then a second click, and the gun went off.
Brown ran away and Wilson gets out of the car. He calls for help, but pursues anyway.
Wilson tells Brown to get on the ground. But Wilson said Brown had his right hand under his shirt and started running at him.
"I remember having tunnel vision on his right hand, that's all, I'm just focusing on that hand when I was shooting."
"Well, after the last shot my tunnel vision kind of opened up. I remember seeing the smoke from the gun and I kind of looked at him and he's still coming at me, he hadn't slowed down."
"At this point I started backpedalling again, I tell him get on the ground, get on the ground, he doesn't. I shoot another round of shots. Again, I don't recall how many it was or if I hit him every time. I know at least once because he flinched again."
"At this point it looked like he was almost bulking up to run through the shots, like it was making him mad that I'm shooting at him. And the face that he had was looking straight through me, like I wasn't even there, I wasn't even anything in his way."
Wilson feared he would be tackled.
"And when he gets 8-10 feet away, I look down, I remember looking at my sites and firing, all I see is his head and that's what I shot. I don't know how many, I know at least once because I saw the last one go into him. And then when it went into him, the demeanor on his face went blank, the aggression was gone, it was gone, I mean, I knew he stopped, the threat was stopped."
This testimony raises many questions.
So Wilson had to kill Brown, who despite a hand under a shirt, never showed a weapon?
After the initial tussle in the car, when Brown ran away, Wilson had to pursue the unarmed man?
DA McCulloch knew what he was doing when he passed the buck to a grand jury. Instead of open proceedings, they were secret. And instead of lawyers for both sides, the DA's team presented the case.
The grand jury heard evidence, but it wasn't supposed to try the case.
It simply had to decide if there were enough facts to bring the case forward to charge Wilson with any of these four crimes: first-degree murder, second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter or involuntary manslaughter.
It could have even charged him with an armed criminal action, if he were carrying a loaded firearm with the intent to commit a felony.
Mc Culloch implied the grand jury was diverse, but he knew it wasn't. No Asians, no Hispanics. This was typical 1950s St. Louis. Six white men, three white women, one black man and two black women.
The grand jury was set for polarization. It took nine votes to bring back an indictment for any charges against Officer Wilson.
But there was no indictment for anything. Not even a lesser charge.
And then the feeling sinks in.
What about justice?
Posted by:Emil Guillermo
| 0 comments
Emil Guillermo: Executive action, immigration, and nostalgia for when government really did work
November 15, 2014 7:41 PM
Immigration reform? By executive action? The thing Asian Americans have talked about for nearly a year now?
Yes, yes, yes.
According to media reports, the plan would provide deportation relief for up to 5 million people. It would expand Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), the program for DREAMers, that could make many more people eligible by changing the cutoff date to 2010 and eliminating the age limit on individuals. And undocumented parents of children who are citizens or legal residents may be able to get work permits.
The proposal still wouldn't include the family unity items Asian Americans want, like a speedier process for bringing relatives to the U.S. But there could be new tech visas in the offing. And there's talk about eliminating the mandatory fingerprinting program under Secure Communities, or S-Comm, that led to massive deportations of hundreds of thousands of immigrants since 2009.
Of course, when the leaker of the "good news" is Fox News
, one has a right to be suspicious. I don't think this was a ploy to make up for Megyn Kelly
's "F" bomb when she introduced GOP presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee. (Hint: She didn't call him "Fike.")
But the leak did act as a battle cry to the Tea Party regulars to gear up for the "executive action is amnesty and amnesty is unconstitutional" fight.
When The New York Times
finally got their leak on so they didn't have to quote Fox, we knew that the truth was somewhere in between here and Asia, where the President chose to recover from the midterm elections.
It does seem to be a good way to get away from it all, doesn't it?
Obama started his Asia trip with the release of Asian American Kenneth Bae from the North Koreans (which proves the pres has more game than Dennis Rodman). But maybe the immigration leak works out for the president as well. Nothing like talking about executive action on immigration when you're halfway around the world in Myanmar, far from your most outspoken opponents. (And a kind of shout out to Burmese American immigrants.)
President Obama and Aung San Suu Kyi at joint press conference in Myanmar.
That didn't stop Tea Party House members from announcing there's a Dec.12 deadline to fund the government and they're looking to put a lump of coal in everyone's stocking. Already Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ), Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL) and Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA) (who beat Eric Cantor) are leading a charge to attach a rider blocking any immigration reform--or else.
The "or else"?
Shut down the government, of course.
If the message of the low-turnout midterms was that voters want the politicians to start working toward solutions, apparently some didn't get that memo.
Asian Americans, however, are solidly for executive action on immigration, according to the multilingual exit poll
of over 4,100 Asian American voters that was conducted by AALDEF in collaboration with 65 national and local community groups in 11 states.
In response to the question "If Congress does not act on immigration reform, do you think President Obama should take his own executive actions on immigration?" 65% of Asian Americans polled said yes.
So now we wait for the president to get back from Asia to formally announce details of the plan as soon as Friday.
It could be the showdown that will ultimately define the Obama legacy. And if it doesn't do that, it surely will provide us with another example of our country's political dysfunction.
It makes me nostalgic for the days when I worked for Congressman Norm Mineta, a moderate liberal Democrat, who'd call on his old friends, such as the late Congressman Henry Hyde, or the former Senator Alan Simpson.
Working both sides of the aisle toward a solution wasn't considered being a sellout.
And compromise wasn't considered a dirty word.
"People are so afraid of compromise they are unable to deliver any results whatsoever for the American people," said David Chiu, the President of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and the newly elected California Assemblyman for District 17.
Chiu, until the end of the month, was part of the Asian American power surge in local San Francisco Bay Area politics. He used to work in Washington for the late Senator Paul Simon, (D-IL), a Liberal with a Capital L. Chiu remembers how Simon would go beyond ideological and regional differences to work with congressional colleagues and get things done.
David Chiu is not just nostalgic about politics. He rides his bike to work at San Francisco's City Hall.
(© 2014 Photo by Emil Guillermo)
"They would agree to disagree, but also find a way to agree to agree," Chiu said. "That's all being stymied now because we have two sides in their respective corners and they're not willing to move forward. There's no safe space for dialogue...to build consensus....We haven't seen that in Washington, DC, and it's doing an enormous disservice to our country."
Those of you who remember Paul Simon know he wasn't Garfunkel's duet mate.
He was a guy with glasses who often sported a bow-tie.
"He was the leftiest of senators," said Chiu. "But he worked regularly with Republicans to find points of commonality without giving up his principles and values to move the ball along."
Moving the ball forward. That's a far cry from shutting down the government over immigration.
Washington could use a few more of those old-fashioned political folks who still believe in working toward real solutions for all of us in America.
* * *
Posted by:Emil Guillermo
| 0 comments
Emil Guillermo: After the 2014 midterms, the invisible Asian American voter unveiled
November 7, 2014 11:58 AM
The national midterm narrative so far has been about how voters repudiated President Obama and his policies.
But this isn't the Asian American narrative.
Neither is it Elaine Chao standing next to her husband, the presumptive new Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
No, the Asian American narrative is one we know, but the one the white political mainstream is just coming to grips with.
Asian Americans bucked the trend.
The yellow vote was a lot more blue than red.
For example, here's one jarring finding in a three-state election eve poll targeting Asian Americans in multiple languages and ethnicities.
Referendum on Obama? Asian Americans gave the president a 58 percent approval rating.
You didn't see this number in the mainstream media.
The prevailing narrative is more comforting--that the midterms were a reprieve for the white voter.
It ain't dead yet.
But it's close.
Then again, in midterm elections, the people who vote are typically more engaged in politics.
They are the older white voters who may have had a soft spot for FDR and the New Deal. Today, these older voters are more likely to revere Reagan and Bush and vote conservatively.
So if you want to explain why the electoral wash turned red, that's the reason.
Older voters showed up.
Most of the others, the young, the less well off, people of color? They tend to take midterms off. Or are just turned off.
It was interesting to see on the morning after how white pollsters still had to acknowledge the election was not a tsunami, but a warning sign of the bigger tsunami to come-- the inevitable electoral demographic shift.
"The biggest warning sign [on election day] was exactly what we've seen coming, which is the inexorable march of demographic change," said Republican pollster Whit Ayres at a National Journal function. "The electorate was two percent less white this year than it was in 2010, it will be two percent less white four years from now than it was [in this election]. We got a third of the Hispanic vote. We've got to do better with Hispanics, with Asians."
Ah, he said the magic word. "Asians." Almost like an afterthought. It won't be for long, not with Asian Americans the fastest growing electorate, which increased 128 percent from 1996 to 2008.
The invisible Asian American voter is about to be discovered. Because now, politicos finally have to reach out to Asian Americans if they ever want to elect another president.
And what pollsters like Ayres will find is the Democratic stereotype is true. Even in a midterm election awash in red, Asian Americans voted blue in a big way.
According to the election eve poll
conducted by Asian American Decisions and the AAPI Civic Engagement Fund, Asian Americans favored Democratic candidates over Republicans, 66 percent to 34 percent, or nearly two-to-one.
The AALDEF exit poll
, conducted in 11 states, found that 59% of Asian Americans were registered Democrats, 15% were not enrolled in any political party, and 26% were registered Republicans.
The key finding for me was in Virginia, where the Senate incumbent, Democrat Mark Warner, barely edged out Republican challenger Ed Gillespie by .5 percent of the vote.
According to the election eve poll, Warner garnered 68 percent of the Asian American vote to 29 percent for Gillespie.
These results mirrored the findings of the AALDEF exit poll, which found that the Asian American vote was 66 percent for Warner and 33% for Giillespie.
In the Virginia race, the Asian American influence is undeniable. Warner could not have won without the Asian American vote.
But you won't find this kind of data unless groups like AALDEF and the newly-formed Asian American Decisions continue to conduct multilingual polls focusing on Asian American voters.
Right now, mainstream pollsters get information from large random samples. They might get some Asian voters, but only those who speak English. And if pollsters don't sample in populations where we live, the chances of getting enough Asians to matter is even smaller.
AALDEF went to 63 poll sites in 11 states and the District of Columbia and polled in 12 languages: Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Khmer, Arabic, Bengali, Hindi, Punjabi, Urdu, Gujarati, and English.
How do you say Gallup in Urdu?
Pollsters need to purposefully oversample for Asians and do it in our languages. If they don't, they're going to miss out on the story that Asian American voters are saying loud and clear at the polls.
So all's well with Asian Americans for the Democratic Party? Not so fast. The election eve poll and the AALDEF poll both revealed that while Asian Americans like to vote Democratic, we don't always like to identify as Democrats. There's still that large group of Asian Americans who aren't enrolled in any party.
And one other thing the AALDEF exit polling and monitoring found: It's not easy being an Asian American voter.
In monitoring 146 poll sites in 11 states, AALDEF received over 340 complaints
from Asian American voters, such as improper requests for voter ID, hostile poll workers, and lack of interpreters.
And that's just in the targeted districts with larger Asian American populations. One can only imagine the suppression of the Asian American vote in other places.
(© 2014 Photo by Emil Guillermo)
As the election news came in, I kept thinking of Nancy Pelosi a week before the midterms. She was intermittently joyous for the Giants when it rained at their World Series Parade. But I knew she had to be thinking about the downpour to come.
It poured, but it wasn't 1994 with the Gingrich "Contract with America."
Pelosi's not the House Speaker, and she lost allies in the Senate.
But Pelosi won her district by a landslide, thanks to the Asian American vote. Pelosi's known about the Asian American electoral narrative for some time.
For the rest of you, don't believe most of the mainstream exit polls--the ones that didn't talk to Asian Americans and still dub us as "insufficient" in number.
There are nearly two million registered Asian American voters in California alone, and over 4 million nationwide.
That's enough to do some real damage. As San Francisco's Congresswoman, Pelosi knows it.
Asian Americans aren't invisible. We're just in stealth mode.
* * *
Posted by:Emil Guillermo
| 0 comments
Emil Guillermo: On the importance of the unimportance of baseball and the San Francisco Giants
October 31, 2014 8:04 AM
Pardon my October. I've been busy being American Filipino during Filipino American History Month. And in the moments that remain, I've been nervously watching the San Francisco Giants break and unbreak my heart, until they finally decided to win the World Series and give back my life.
(Pablo Sandoval loves a parade, San Francisco, 10.31.14. © 2014 Photo by Emil Guillermo)
Of course, if you are saying, "Emil, I'm a (Fill-in-the-Blank) fan. I don't care about two lousy Wild Card teams in the World Series--it's like watching two Cinderellas battling for a plexiglass slipper."
Perhaps. Only it was even better than that, because it was real glass and the best fairy tale won. The Giants, a team that was practically brain dead in June, was lifted to life in October by Madison Bumgarner.
(© 2014 Photo by Emil Guillermo)
Not "gard-ner," "gar-ner." And he's no bum. He's the pitcher from North Carolina, infamous for giving his wife a cow for her birthday, but also plays for seven months of the year in the biggest and baddest of Asian American cities, San Francisco, the one with Asian American leaders such as mayor, president of its Board of Supervisors, and a State Senator accused of gun-running (OK, make the last one "former").
Madbum, as he's called, delivered a mythic performance--coming off a 117 pitch performance on Sunday (which I witnessed in person)---only to come back to throw another 68 pitches on Wednesday. That just isn't done. 185 pitches with two days rest? Great enough to stymie the Kansas City Royals and give the San Francisco Giants their third World Championship in five years.
That in itself gave the whole post-season some perspective. If you're going to spend your time "involved" in baseball, it had better include a game that will be remembered for all time. And this Game 7, where Bumgarner comes out of the bullpen to save a 3-2 lead for the Giants and win the series. 4 games to 3, I just don't know if there will ever be a performance quite like that. Ever.
And yet. I know. There are more important things to get excited about.
Like elections, Ebola. And Erin Andrews. (No, she's not important. But she did hand the mike to that rotund Chevy exec as the World Series trophy presentation announcer.)
Even after the Giants won, there was a strange violent reaction that spread in the city. It seemed a bit like "Clockwork Orange," with bonfires, two shootings, and forty arrests, mostly for public drunkenness.
This picture was taken from the website Mission Local.
People had a lot of steam to let off.
It brought this response on a blog post from some ultra-realist:
Don't people have more important things to get excited about, like things that are actually important? Why do these people get so whipped up about a bunch of overpaid athletes who have almost no affiliation with the city and are only here because they were offered the most money? It's such a weird one-way relationship: these pro athletes would leave SF in a second if given more money yet Giants fans act like they are family and get all emotional over the results of their games. Bizarre.
I bet he was always the last to get picked for a team in the school yard too.
A friend of mine, the poet and housing activist Tony Robles, was honored this week by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors for Filipino American Heritage Month. He's been fighting the speculation in the city's real estate market that has meant more evictions of poor people of color and the elderly. Recently, he helped a nearly-blind senior citizen being evicted from her home of nearly 30 years. On Facebook, he wrote: "And I'm supposed to get excited about the Giants?"
I don't condone speculation that has led to a housing crisis in San Francisco. Nor do I condone the violent reactions to the Giants' victory.
But there are actually good reasons why sports exist. They are the needed escape that balances our fear of Ebola, bad elections, and Erin Andrews.
(Speaking of elections, we interrupt this blog post to provide this public service announcement. I hope you did your part and prevented a bad election by actually voting. Did you know Asian Americans tend to register and not vote? That's like having a ticket to a Giants game and staying home. Me, I've already voted. By mail. My motto: vote early, and once.)
If we didn't have sports, we'd need to invent something else to offset the grim importance of everything that's not Madison Bumgarner.
It's called adding a bit of perspective.
Something happened during the Series to remind us of life and death.
During Game 5 in San Francisco's AT&T Park, I noticed a tweet about the death of Oscar Taveras, the gifted 22-year old outfielder for the St. Louis Cardinals who died with his girlfriend in a car accident in the Dominican Republic.
Taveras was heralded as one of baseball's next superstars.
During the game, the players all heard the news for the first time through social media.
Later, I was struck watching an interview with Giants catcher Buster Posey. He said Taveras' death should remind us that the games aren't really important at all. He said the news of Taveras' passing had brought things back down to earth.
And yet we play on, because if we don't, we can easily give in to the despair.
Another life and death moment came when the late Robin Williams was shown up on the big screen rooting on the Giants.
At the same time on the field were his three kids.
Zak, Williams' eldest child from his first wife, threw the ceremonial first pitch, while Zelda and Cody, Williams' two American Filipino kids from his second wife Marcia Garces, watched.
It was a celebration of Williams--another reminder of his greatness and how, as his kids threw the first pitch, life goes on.
That's what we choose, and we play on.
My own personal life-and-death moment came when the Giants won Game 7. My cousins Bryan and Albert posted pictures of themselves celebrating on Market Street in downtown San Francisco (not in the Mission district) on the Facebook page of our late cousin Stephen.
I don't know if Stephen has internet where he is, but his cousins just wanted to tell him the Giants won and that they missed him. A lot.
You'll recall my cousin Stephen was shot and killed last May when he entered the wrong San Francisco apartment. The family has yet to see a police or coroner's report. While the case remains open, DA George Gascon has declined to file charges.
My family is left with the memories of Stephen, 26, who was buried in his Giants jersey. In life, he had no hits, no runs, no errors. But when the team found out about his story, the Giants put up a tribute to him on the scoreboard, as if he had hit a home run.
That's what baseball and a team like the Giants can mean to individuals in a community where baseball is like a public trust.
On Friday, two million of those individuals will be in San Francisco to share their joy for their heroes in a championship victory parade.
My friend, the activist, said he won't be anywhere near the parade.
Don't kid yourself. We all need it more than you think. Besides, black and orange are Halloween colors. Giants colors.
As life gets harder with all of its inequality and sadness, diversions--such as baseball--become more important and allow us to keep up the fight for the ones that really matter.
* * *
Posted by:Emil Guillermo
| 0 comments